Project Overview

Biodiversity conservation planning requires spatial data (Ferrier, 2003; Nagendra, 2001). Information on the spatial distribution of wildlife species, as well as the location and extent of their habitat, is essential in developing conservation strategies. However, traditional ground-based survey and mapping methods cannot always deliver the necessary information in a timely and cost-effective fashion (Gottschalk et al., 2005). This is particularly true when the mapping required is at the fine-scale level.

Remote sensing techniques offer solutions to the problems associated with ground-based collection of environmental data over large areas (Mason, et al., 2003). However, many of the contemporary remote sensing applications for habitat mapping have used relatively coarse-resolution imagery, and are therefore incapable of capturing fine-scale variables relevant to some wildlife species.The known habitat of threatened reptiles of the Queensland Brigalow Belt (QBB) includes areas with fallen leaf-litter, branches, hollow logs, rocky outcrops, native trees, old mature trees, soil cracks, and patches of scrub (Wilson, 2003). Such microhabitat attributes entail detailed, fine-resolution mapping. This partly explains why no fine-scale satellite-based habitat mapping has ever been done for threatened reptiles in the Brigalow Belt or elsewhere in Australia. The launch of recent radar (e.g. ALOS) and high spatial resolution (e.g. QuickBird) sensors offers new and exciting possibilities

Many of the habitat predictive models that ulitised satellite imagery have used relatively coarse-grained data (e।g. Boyd, et al., 2006; Pelkey, et al., 2003). Thus, they are only useful where the organism of concern has habitat requirements that can be identified adequately at coarse scales (Mason, et al., 2003). For the threatened reptiles of the Brigalow Belt, the identification and mapping of their habitat requires fine-scale resolution (e.g. 1:10,000) due to their habitat preferences. Reptiles require specific microhabitat characteristics within their preferred broad habitat type (Richardson, 2006).

These microhabitat attributes (e.g. ground cover, rock outcrops, soil cracks, low-lying shrubs, etc.) will need sensors that are capable of providing information about vegetation structure, surface roughness, biomass, micro-topography, etc. at a fine scale. Previous studies using radar imagery have demonstrated that many of these variables can be extracted (e.g. Hill et al., 2005; Held, et al., 2003; Lucas et al., 2006; Hewson and Taylor, 2000). However, as most of these radar sensors are either mounted on airborne systems or on satellite platforms that have implications on imagery costs or spatial resolution, their applications to fine-scale habitat mapping is limited or non-existent.The Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS), launched last year, offers great potential to map reptile habitat. It has an active radar sensor using the L-band frequency (for better canopy penetration and surface rougness characterisation), and with fine spatial resolution (best of 7-10m) (JAXA, 2007). ALOS is also equipped with a 2.5m sensor suitable for generating high resolution digital elevation model (DEM). Coupled with the use of high resolution imagery operating in the optical wavelengths, the use of new generation radar imagery offers exciting new prospects for habitat mapping and monitoring.

Project Objectives

Our aim is to assess the ability of new radar imagery and high resolution multispectral imagery to estimate habitat attributes (metrics) associated with threatened reptiles of the Queensland Brigalow Belt. Specifically, the objectives are: (1) to evaluate the relationships between habitat metrics collected from the field and those generated from radar-multispectral imagery, focusing on "yakka skink" (Egernia rugosa), and (2) to develop a predictive habitat model by utilising field data, imagery, and thematic maps in a geographic information system (GIS) environment.

This study covers several innovative components: a) the first study on using high-resolution satellite imagery to map threatened reptile in the Brigalow Belt; b) a pioneering study to utilise ALOS radar imagery for wildlife habitat mapping in Australia; and c) a novel study that will attempt to evaluate (in the context of habitat mapping) the utility of space-borne sensors to map non-traditional variables like rock outcrops, fallen leaf-litter, branches, hollow logs, understorey old trees, surface roughness, etc.We considered the use of laser remote sensing (lidar) to test its capability to estimate the above variables. Recent biodiversity studies (e.g. Goetz, et al., 2006) indicate lidar's better performance than the traditional remote sensing imagery. But due to the prohibitive cost of lidar data at present, we did not pursue this option. However, this current proposed project, if approved, will be a springboard for future project undertakings on lidar-radar-multispectral data integration

Methods

The project will involve the following key tasks: a) formally define the habitat metrics to be estimated in this study, b) select the study area, c) acquire radar and high resolution multispectral imagery, and other thematic maps (e.g. bedrock geology, landform, hydrology, soil, etc.), d) conduct intensive field data collection, e) process, analyse, and develop the model, and f) assess the image classification accuracy and validate the model.

The habitat metrics initially identified in this study are a) ground cover attributes (amount of leaf litter, fallen timber, fallen bark, etc.), b) presence of rock outcrops, c) presence of low-lying shrubs, d) presence of native trees, e) vegetation community or association, f) aboveground biomass, and g) selected vegetation structural metrics (e.g. canopy height, canopy cover, etc.). Attempts will be made to "combine" datasets to explore potential synergies in generating information. For instance, the use of radar imagery, bedrock geology and elevation may give information on rock outcrops and surface roughness.

The potential study sites in the southern Brigalow Belt have already been identified: a) near Rockhampton, b) south to St George, and c) west to Chesterton Range National Park. These areas were reported to have a high number of yakka skink (Richardson, 2006). Populations of yakka skink have recently been discovered at Thurshton National Park and Culgoa Floodplain National Park. These candidate sites will be assessed based on the presence of microhabitat attributes.

ALOS imagery, particularly the fine beam mode Phased Array type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR) data, will be acquired through Geoscience Australia. Radar images acquired on single (HH or VV) or dual (HH+HV or VV+VH) polarisations will be purchased. The 2.5m panchromatic image (PRISM) and the10m visible and near-infrared range image (AVNIR2) will be also acquired. The PRISM imagery presents an opportunity to generate high resolution DEM to derive topographic information, such as slope, aspect, terrain ruggedness, etc. To complement the AVNIR2 data which can provide information on vegetation and non-photosynthetic vegetation (NPV) cover, we will also acquire high resolution IKONOS, QuickBird or 2.5m SPOT-5 imagery.

We will selectively employ the field methods in remote sensing as recommended by McCoy (2005). In particular, stratified random sampling strategy will be used to locate field sample plots. Initially, the ground cover theme will serve as the basis in determining the number of categories or strata (e.g. 3-4 classes) and their significance. Along with accessibility factors, available resources, and ground resolution of the image data, the strata information will help determine the total number of samples to be collected. Approximately 70% of the total number of samples will be used in training and calibration, while the remaining 30% will be set aside for accuracy assessment and validation.

Some of the measurements will involve the use of "standard" measurement techniques, e.g. determining tree height and crown diameter, measuring slope, biomass, measuring leaf litter, counting hollow logs, etc. For variables that may be difficult to quantify (e.g. rock outcrop), the literature and experts will be consulted.

Various pre-processing techniques for spatial datasets will be implemented, e.g. projection and coordinate transformation, clipping, image transformation, masking, etc. These are essential prior to data analysis, since many of the datasets will come from disparate sources, formats, and coverages. There are few statistical and modelling techniques that were developed for wildlife habitat mapping. We will examine the suitability of different techniques, such as logistic and multiple regression analyses (e.g. Sergio et al., 2004), evidential reasoning algorithm (e.g. Franklin et al., 2002), and maximum likelihood classification (e.g. Danks and Klein, 2002). For this project, we will assess various options, and possibly develop our own methods.Image accuracy assessment will be done to quantify the success of image classification. Using field data, we will construct a confusion/error matrix to generate several statistics (e.g. kappa index of agreement) indicative of classification accuracy. In validating the output map from predictive modelling, this project will use the test samples collected during the field work

Field Work

Field work was carried out in a variety of vegetation communities and landscape features surrounding Glenmorgan, south east Queensland. The field work was carried out during September, 2007. In total, 36 vegetation sites and 34 non-vegation sites (waterbodies, agrcultural plots, rocky and urban areas etc.) were surveyed during field work. At each site, co-ordates were taken and assessments of vegetation structure and cover were carried out.








On site assessments of vegetation communities was carried out at 36 different sites througout the study area.




Assessments of tree canopy cover were undertaken at each of the vegetated sites surveyed.




Locations of water bodies was also noted during field work.







Areas that were planted with crops were recorded and details of co-oridates taken.






Fallow areas of agricultural land were assessed during field work visits.




A Common Bearded Bragon (Pogona barbata) that was encountered during field surveys.




Different vegetation communities were surveyed. Above is a Cypress Pine (Callitris glaucophylla) dominated patch of vegetation.



Piles of logs are thought to provide important

habitat for vulnerbale reptile species, such as the yakka skink.

Reptile Species Found in the Study Area

There are many species of reptiles found within the Brigalow belt south where this research is being undertaken. Below some information useful when mapping reptile habitat for species known to inhabit the study area is given. For more information on reptile species in the area see the links given below. There are also some links to information about wildlife mapping using GIS and remotes sensing techniques.


Common name: De Vis' Banded Snake

Species: Denisonia devisi

Status: Common

Habitat: Low-lying moist areas associated with shrub lands and woodlands. Beneath logs or rocks, in soil cracks & disused burrows or termitaria.


Common name: Eastern Stone Gecko

Species: Diplodactylus vittatus

Status: Common

Habitat: Beneath small stones, fallen bark, timber and surface debris.


Common name: Yakka Skink

Species: Egernia rugosa

Status: Vulnerable

Habitat: Heaped piles of dead timber; hollow logs individuals dig a deep burrow system under and between partly buried rocks or logs or rotted-out tracts at the base of remnant stumps (Photo: Myall Park Botanic Garden)


Common name: Bynoe's Gecko

Species: Heteronotia binoei

Status: Common

Habitat: Widespread all subhumid arid habitats. Rocks, logs, loose bark at base of stumps and dead vegetation.


Common name: Golden-Tailed Gecko

Species: Strophurus taenicauda

Status: Rare

Habitat: Dry open forests and woodlands, cypress pine, iron bark Bulloak & Brigalow Belah dominated communities. Hollow limbs & loose bark, saplings and tree trunks. (Photo: s102.photobucket.com)